I am considering installing either MacPorts or Homebrew and am hoping for more experienced OS-X users to provide some input. Reddit amt emulator painter mac. I have one month of experience with OS-X ( MBPr running El Capitan). That said, I do have ~ 8 years experience running FreeBSD for various Internet facing servers so MacPorts seems very similar to BSD ports and packages at first glance. Plans are to use my macbook for programming and as any other typical user, (i.e for storing, managing photos, music, email, etc etc.) I am very comfortable at the command line for FreeBSD and likewise OS-X as well. Not sure what took me so long to migrate to OS-X from Windows:-) Finally, thanks in advance for any and all input.
Check the amount of free space on your drive in Disk Utility. Not only do you need additional space the size of the Identity, the system also needs room to work. Microsoft office update for mac os high sierra download. Check the size by doing a Get Info on the Identity. If your drive is old and fragmented, it will require even more free space.
I have searched and researched both. From what I have found it appears most choose macPorts but I wanted to hear opinions from here as well. Thanks again! I do have ~ 8 years experience running FreeBSD for various Internet facing servers so MacPorts seems very similar to BSD ports and packages at first glance. That is exactly right; and for that reason, you should not bother with Homebrew; you would be disappointed. Homebrew is geared towards ease of use, and its repository is limited by the fact that it uses OS X's shipped libraries wherever it can. MacPorts maintains its entire tree, so it provides access to the current mainline version for any given package.
Over time, as tools have improved, and with new releases of OS X, I've updated this tutorial. With Sierra, El Capitan, Yosemite and Mavericks, setting up a development environment on a Mac with Apple's standalone Command Line Tools, Homebrew, Git, RVM, Ruby, and Rails is a fairly stress-free process that's no longer fraught with the issues from.
Im a vivid BSD user (free+Open) but still I went with Homebrew: Homebrew will not overwrite things that should be installed 'natively' in osx. This means that if there is a native package available, homebrew will notify you instead of overwriting it and causing problems further down the line. It also installs libraries in the user space (thus, you don't need to use 'sudo' to install things). This helps when getting rid of libraries as well since everything is in a path accessible to you. Homebrew also enjoys a more active user community and its packages (called formulas) are updated quite often. Macport has more packages, is native and supports groups.
Homebrew will not overwrite things I don't know of any package manager that will overwrite OS X's shipped packages, nor any that will affect OS X's resolution of its shipped dependancies. If this is something that users struggle with, then it is simply due to a misconfigured shell environment (although this is one advantage to Homebrew in that it does not require the configuration of one's PATH, MANPATH, etcetera). It also installs libraries in the user space (thus, you don't need to use 'sudo' to install things). It is a common misconception that this is an advantage of Homebrew. In fact, not requiring root privileges to modify a systemwide software directory is a major deviation from traditional best practices. In every OS that has /usr/local, it is root-owned. Moreover, every user-maintainable systemwide software directory in OS X (/Applications, /Library, etcetera) are root-owned.